BPC-157 vs GHK-Cu
A detailed comparison to help you understand the differences and choose the right peptide for your research.
BPC-157 and GHK-Cu are both powerful healing peptides, but they excel in different areas. BPC-157 is primarily known for deep tissue healing (tendons, gut, muscle), while GHK-Cu is renowned for skin healing and anti-aging. Understanding their strengths helps choose the right peptide for specific healing needs.
Quick Comparison
Key Similarities
- Both promote tissue healing
- Both have anti-inflammatory properties
- Both support wound repair
- Both can be used injectable
- Both are well-tolerated
- Both have multiple mechanisms of action
Key Differences
- BPC-157 excels at deep tissue; GHK-Cu at skin
- BPC-157 heals gut; GHK-Cu does not
- GHK-Cu is used topically; BPC-157 rarely is
- GHK-Cu has stronger anti-aging skin effects
- BPC-157 better for tendon/ligament injuries
- GHK-Cu modulates thousands of genes
When to Choose Each
Choose BPC-157
Choose BPC-157 for internal healing—tendon/ligament injuries, gut issues, muscle damage, or systemic tissue repair. It's the go-to for sports injuries and gastrointestinal healing.
Choose GHK-Cu
Choose GHK-Cu for skin-focused goals—anti-aging, wound healing, scar reduction, or hair growth. Its topical application makes it ideal for accessible cosmetic and skin health benefits.
Can You Stack Them?
BPC-157 and GHK-Cu can be effectively combined for comprehensive healing—BPC-157 for internal tissues and GHK-Cu for skin. For wounds or injuries involving skin, using both may accelerate overall healing.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- Sikiric P, et al. "BPC 157 healing effects." Curr Pharm Des, 2018. PMID: 29737246
- Pickart L, et al. "GHK-Cu regenerative properties." Biomed Res Int, 2015. PMID: 26236730
Get the Complete Comparison Guide
Download our detailed comparison charts and decision framework.